Have you
ever seen a ghost? Have you talked to it? Well, I guess if you did, you would
have described the situation to one similar from a horror movie, right?
However, Hamlet did not even run away across a corridor because he saw his
death father, on the contrary, he just talked to him in a way similar to a Ghostbusters
Elizabethan version.
I wish, I
was as brave as him, but let’s stop a little bit to what the ghost actually
said.
First, he
claims that he is his father, and clearly looks like him. Then, he explains
that his death is actually a murder committed by his brother; Hamlet’s uncle
and actual king. Third, because of words like “doomed” and being in “tormenting
flames”, thus the desperation of his words about being revenged in order to
make his crimes “burnt and purged away”, we can infer that he is not in heaven
at all. According, to the catholic perspective he would be in purgatory, because
he actually can be saved. Then the contradictions begin, because seen from that
perspective spirits who are in that state should not try to make other sin or
they would stay where they are. So, why is he suffering from not being
revenged?
From the
other religious point of view; for Protestants purgatory does not exist at all.
This is another contradiction, since it is said that Denmark is a protestant
nation and actually Hamlet attended to Wittenberg a school where the protestant
reformation began. Therefore, he was not
his father at all, just an evil force.
All in all,
I think that what the ghost says does not really matters; it is hamlet’s
reaction to his words what moves him in the direction to revenge. A clear
example of this idea is the mouse trap, since he needed to be sure of the words
of his father.
Hamlet, do
you really believe in the Ghost? Or are you a super expert of spirits? Is that
the reason you had to test it?
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario